Hon. Jeffrey Chase reports:
The Acting AG, in some twisted take on Ernie Banks (“Let’s play two!) just certified two cases to himself:
§ 1101(a)(42)(A) based on the alien’s membership in a family unit.”
andMatter of Castillo-Perez, to determine(1) In connection with an application for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b), what is the appropriate legal standard for determining when an individual lacks “good moral character” under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)?(2) What impact should multiple convictions for driving while intoxicated or driving under the influence have in determining when an individual lacks “good moral character” under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)?
(3) What impact should multiple such convictions have in determining whether to grant discretionary relief under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b).
The Acting Attorney General ordered that the case be stayed during the pendency of his review.
**************************
Go on over to the EOIR website for more information: https://www.justice.gov/eoir
The BIA is rapidly becoming irrelevant. But since the Acting Attorney General isn’t an expert in immigration laws, his decisions should get no deference from the real courts. And, then there is the question of whether he really is the Acting Attorney General . . . .
Stay tuned.
PWS
12-03-18