⚖️🗽🛡️⚔️ANOTHER PROUD ACHIEVEMENT FOR OUR ROUND TABLE: SPEAKING UP FOR DUE PROCESS IN MONSALVO-VELAZQUEZ V. BONDI (SCT)

From Hon. “Sir Jeffrey” S. Chase:

Hi all: The Supreme Court issued its decision today in Monsalvo-Velazquez v. Bondi, in which our Round Table filed an amicus brief at the request of Petitioner’s counsel.

I’m happy to report that in a 5-4 decision written by Justice Gorsuch (attached), the Court agreed with the position that when the deadline for voluntary departure falls on a weekend or holiday, the period for VD extends to the next business day.

We had explained in our brief that this reading is consistent with long-settled practices in the immigration courts.

Congrats to all, and much thanks to attorneys Collin White and Scott Angstreich of the law firm of Kellogg Hansen for representing us on the brief..

For our new members, this is the fifth time that the Round Table has filed a brief in a winning Supreme Court case. The others are:

Niz-Chavez v. Garland, holding that the INA’s “stop time” rule for cancellation of removal may only be triggered by the filing of an NTA that is a single document, containing all the necessary information (this decision made many thousands eligible for cancellation of removal);

Nasrallah v. Barr, allowing CAT applicants to seek judicial review of factual challenges to a CAT order notwithstanding the limitations created by sections 1252(a)(2)(C) and (D) of the Act;

Wilkinson v. Garland, holding that hardship determinations in cancellation B cases are mixed questions of fact and law, and are therefore reviewable by circuit courts; and

Santos-Zacaria v. Garland, which held that where the BIA commits error in its decision, a respondent need not first seek reopening by the Board in order to exhaust its remedies before seeking judicial review.

I think this is a record to be very proud of.

All my best, Jeff