Mexico Searches For Equilibrium With New Administration!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/top-mexican-official-warns-of-a-new-era-in-relations-with-the-us-under-trump/2017/01/09/71658602-8bed-47c4-9ebe-7bd04d5dd631_story.html

“In his speech Monday, Videgaray asserted Mexico’s importance to the United States and vowed to defend his country’s sovereignty. As examples of the benefits of trade and immigration, he cited the close relationship between auto plants in Mexico and Michigan, Mexican companies that have invested in Dallas, and the key role played by Mexican workers in the milk industry in Wisconsin.

Trump has criticized American companies for moving factory jobs to Mexico, and threatened to impose a “border tax” on firms that make products there bound for U.S. markets. Ford recently announced that it had canceled plans for a $1.6 billion plant in Hermosillo, Mexico, after Trump’s repeated criticism of Ford and other companies. The Mexican government is concerned that it will lose manufacturing jobs due to measures proposed by Trump.

“We are going to negotiate with great self-confidence; without fear, knowing the economic, social and political importance that Mexico has for the United States, and we are going to negotiate with intelligence and common sense,” Videgaray added.

He said he wanted to make it clear that “these millions of Mexicans who have emigrated to look for work are not as they have been described — criminals — but they are productive people who represent in the majority of cases the best of Mexico.”

PWS

01/09/17

Is Trump’s Plan To Remove 3 Million “Criminal Aliens” Achievable?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-trumps-plan-to-deport-criminal-noncitizens-wont-work/2017/01/03/b68a3018-c627-11e6-85b5-76616a33048d_story.html?utm_term=.4810f9c58fbd

“No,” says Professor and Immigration Practitioner Kari Hong of Boston College Law School in this op-ed in the Washington Post:

“If Trump truly wants to focus on drug dealers, terrorists, murderers and rapists, he should call on Congress to restore immigration law’s focus on those whom prosecutors and criminal judges determined were dangerous in the first place — people who were sentenced to five years or more in prison. That’s what the law used to be, before it was changed in 1996 to cover many more crimes.

Instead of penalizing immigrants for minor crimes, immigration law needs to separate contributing immigrants from their non-contributing peers. Those who pay taxes, have children born in the United States, serve in the military, work in jobs American citizens will not take or help those around them need a path to legalization. Those who cause more harm than good should be deported. Restoring proportionality and common sense to immigration law would certainly help make America great again.”

**********************

Go over to ImmigrationProf Blog and the Washington Post at the above link and get the whole story.

PWS

01/04/17

 

In Foreign Policy, We Should Think “Marshall” (As In Gen. George C.) Not “Martial” — Dropping Bombs Unlikely To Secure World Peace Or Insure American Security

http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/02/opinion/marshall-plans-not-martial-plans.html?smprod=nytcore-iphone&smid=nytcore-iphone-share

Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) writes in a NY Times op-ed:

“Even after Iraq, American foreign policy and military elites still cling to the notion that military intervention can bring political stability, somehow, to the Middle East. This is a fallacy.

Restraint in the face of evil is hard stuff, but hubris in the face of evil is worse. The United States never should have taken sides in the Syrian civil war. If we had shown restraint from the outset, more people would be alive today.

The real question is how to stop societies from descending into civil war in the first place. This is the most important foreign policy question facing the next Congress. The response must start with a recognition that a foreign policy built on brute military strength alone holds few answers for societies caught in a downward spiral.”

******************************

In October 2016, Dr. Franziska Hötte, a Federal Judge from Germany, and I were invited to be panelists at the German Law in Context Series sponsored by Washington and Lee University Law School in Lexington, Virginia.   During the event, our wonderful law student guide took us on a walking our which included a stop at the General George C. Museum on the adjacent campus of Virginia Military Institute.

Not only was Marshall a five-star General who, as Chief of Staff of the United States Army, led the Allied Forces to victory in World War II, he also served as Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense during the Truman Administration. Indeed he was the last, and only, military officer to receive a waiver of the “civilian leadership only protocol” to enable him to serve as Secretary of Defense.    (As we know, President Elect Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Defense, Marine General James S. Mattis, will need such a waiver to serve).

But, General Marshall’s most impressive achievements came in peacetime, where he conceptualized, organized, and sold the “Marshall Plan” for reconstructing Europe to a somewhat skeptical Congress and American public. His vision lead directly to the emergence of modern Europe as a strong economic force, and to a bulwark of alliances among Western Democracies against the further spread of Soviet Communism during the Cold War period. General Marshall was Time Magazine’s “Man of the Year” in 1943, and received the 1953 Nobel Peace Prize for the Marshall Plan.

Interestingly, Marshall was a somewhat mediocre student at VMI, excelling mostly at football, horsemanship, and, not surprisingly, leadership.

General Marshall was an amazing combination of warrior, statesman, diplomat, visionary, and persuader. I find it difficult to envision anyone today with the skill set and credibility to sell such a large peacetime investment by the United States in rebuilding the economies and infrastructures of former foreign enemies. Indeed, these days the proposition of rebuilding our own crumbling infrastructure sometimes seems like a challenging “sell.”

Below is a picture of Judge Hötte (left) with our student guide taken on the VMI Parade Ground.    I highly recommend the Marshall Museum, which can be “done” in several hours.

PWS

01/02/17