Category: Jeff Sessions

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-to-inherit-more-than-100-court-vacancies-plans-to-reshape-judiciary/2016/12/25/d190dd18-c928-11e6-85b5-76616a33048d_story.html?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_trumpjudges805p:homepage/story&utm_term=.3eb2c51133dc

According to this article from today’s Washington Post, the incoming Trump Administration is preparing to fill more than 100 lifetime Federal Judicial appointments in addition to an existing vacancy on the Supreme Court.  That’s almost twice the number of vacancies that were available to the incoming Obama Administration eight years ago.  The article points out that since these appointments require Senate confirmation, Democrats might have some bargaining power.  But, with Republicans in the majority, that’s likely to be quite limited.

However, there might be an even bigger opportunity available for the incoming Administration —  reshaping the U.S. Immigration Court System for many years to come.  Plagued by a self-created ponderously glacial selection and hiring process, and a badly outdated and ineffective  court structure and administration, the Obama Administration is on track to leave nearly 100 out of the just under 400 authorized U.S. Immigration positions “on the table.”  Additionally, there currently are two vacancies on the critically important Immigration Appeals Court (known as the “Board of Immigration Appeals”), which is effectively the “Supreme Court” of immigration law, with authority to decide tens of thousands of appeals annually and to set binding precedents for our nation’s more than 50 U.S. Immigration Courts.  Beyond that, a significant number of the most experienced Immigration Judges are “baby boomers” who are currently eligible to retire or will become eligible shortly.  For most of the Obama Administration, Immigration Judge hiring has barely exceeded the retirement replacement rate.

The bulk of the currently unfilled vacancies were relatively recently authorized by a bipartisan Congressional effort.  But, not so recently that they could not have been filled by a management process that treated them as what they are — probably the most important large group of senior career Civil Service positions in Government and certainly within the U.S. Department of Justice, the repository for the Immigration Courts.  Beyond helping to authorize the additional positions, however, Congressional Democrats have paid scant attention to the public unraveling of our Immigration Court system during the past eight years.

With over 500,000 pending cases, the Immigration Court System actually has a larger caseload that the entire U.S. District Court System — Civil and Criminal Dockets — with only about 60% of the authorized number of judges.  Moreover, unlike U.S. District Court Judges, who are appointed by the President for life with Senate confirmation required, U.S. Immigration Judges are civil servants appointed by the Attorney General, and they serve at his or her pleasure.  Consequently, Democrats cannot point the collective finger at Republicans for the high vacancy rate and the dismal state of justice in our largely dysfunctional Immigration Court System.  Republicans generally have supported more resources for the overburdened Immigration Courts, and the hiring process has been within the sole control of the Obama Administration’s Department of Justice.

Assuming confirmation, new Attorney General Jeff Sessions potentially could select approximately 25% of the Immigration Judiciary, with more down the road.  No Senate confirmation is required, and the new Attorney General would not be bound to follow the current hiring practices.

Because Due Process — the Immigration Courts’ one and only mission — should be a nonpartisan, nonpolitical issue, I hope that Attorney General Sessions will establish an efficient, strictly merit based hiring system that will be transparent and provide opportunity for meaningful input and participation from all segments of the immigration community, including  practitioners, clinicians, and non-governmental organizations, as well as government entities involved in the administration of our immigration laws.  For example, the board-based merit selection processes used for U.S. Magistrate Judges and U.S. Bankruptcy Judges have won widespread acclaim for putting professional qualifications and demonstrated excellence before partisanship.

But, if that doesn’t happen, and Democrats don’t like the results, they will have only themselves to blame for failing to pay attention and make the needed administrative and structural improvements to our critically important Immigration Court System over the past eight years.

PWS

12/26/16