“Dreamers” Worry About Fate of DACA — Under Trump Administration, What Will Happen To The Lives They Have Built In America?

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2017/0104/For-immigrant-Dreamers-an-uncertain-future

“There is much at stake, too, for undocumented immigrants like Brady, who have grown up, gone to school, and struggled to make sense of their futures.

“I was just a kid when I came, and I really didn’t know what immigration status really meant,” says Brady, who grew up and attended public schools in Washington Heights, which New Yorkers often call “Little DR” because of the many Dominican immigrants who live there. “I wasn’t really worrying about it until my senior year in high school when I had to start thinking about colleges.”

“But when I started to really understand what my life was going to be like, I started freaking out, I started to panic,” she continues. “Why was I going to school? What is the point of going to college if I couldn’t get a career if I was an illegal immigrant?”

She pressed on, doing what a lot of low-income New Yorkers do. She volunteered at a home for the elderly, she attended summer academic programs, she made her high school honor roll and tutored younger peers.

And after getting accepted to John Jay College of Criminal Justice, she worked long hours as a bartender, off the books, to pay her way. It was overwhelming, she says, until she got a scholarship from a local civic group. “I was over the moon, full of joy and crying and happy after getting it,” she says.

She loved her days tutoring and eventually decided to become a teacher.

“As cliché and corny as this sounds, it’s like some people just have their calling,” the graduate student now says. “It took me a while to figure it out, but it truly makes my heart happy.”

Yet she still felt that she was “living in the shadows, being a part of something, but not really,” during her 20 years coming of age in the United States. Now married to a US citizen, she says Obama’s order finally helped her become “DACA-mented,” as many Dreamers call it, and be authorized to teach math in New York City public schools.”

************************************

The possibility of a legislative compromise to help the “Dreamers” while beefing up immigration enforcement is discussed in this article by Nolan Rappaport in The Hill:

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/immigration/311243-gop-immigration-bill-gives-dreamers-a-break-hardliners-a-bone

It was also discussed in my blog of 12/30/16.

PWS

01/05/17

Experts Doubt Trump’s Ability To Make Good On Campaign Promises Of Mass Deportations, But Do Expect Him To Have Major Impact On Immigration Enforcement

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/04/politics/donald-trump-immigration/index.html

A group of immigration experts on both sides of the issue interviewed by CNN all doubted that the Trump Administration would be able to carry out mass removals on the scale Trump alluded to on the campaign trail.  Among the problems:  Congressional funding for more enforcement and detention, severely backlogged U.S. Immigration Courts, practical problems of locating and processing undocumented individuals within the United States, and potential large scale resistance by states, cities, counties, and universities to overly aggressive enforcement efforts.

Here’s an excerpt (full article posted above):

“Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center For Immigration Studies, a non-partisan think tank in Washington, said Trump’s campaign pledges to deport millions amounted to an “Archie Bunker moment” that should not have been taken seriously.
“He’s not going to be snapping his fingers and deporting millions of people over night,” said Krikorain, whose group’s motto is “Low-Immigration, pro-immigrant.”

“That’s not realistic,” Krikorian said. “No one thinks that’s going to happen.”

But Krikorian said “it’s very plausible” that Trump could ramp up deportations by 25% or more in 2017 and return to levels seen under Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, which he said reached about 400,000 a year when Bush left office.

That, he said, could be done without significant budgetary increases and despite resistance from sanctuary cities.

“I think the other side is making it seem more complicated than it needs to be,” he said.

Stephen Yale-Loehr, who teaches immigration law at Cornell Law School, agreed that Trump would be able to have meaningful impact during the first year of his presidency, but not to the extent suggested during the campaign.

“On the campaign trail things are not nuanced. They’re black and white,” Yale-Loehr said. “It takes a while to turn the battleship of bureaucracy around.”

PWS

01/04/17

Will Workplace Immigration Raids Return Under Trump Administration?

http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/02/us/illegal-immigrants-raids-deportation.html?mabReward=A4&recp=0&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&region=CColumn&module=Recommendation&src=rechp&WT.nav=RecEngine&_r=0

“But as President-elect Donald J. Trump prepares to take office and promises to swiftly deport two million to three million undocumented immigrants who have committed crimes, bipartisan experts say they expect a return of the raids that rounded up thousands of workers at carwashes, meatpacking plants, fruit suppliers and their homes during the Bush years.

“If Trump seriously wants to step up dramatically the number of arrests, detentions and removals, I think he has to do workplace raids,” said Michael J. Wishnie, a professor at Yale Law School who represents detainees in civil rights cases.

Since the election, Mr. Trump has suggested that he plans to focus on deporting criminals. “What we are going to do is get the people that are criminal and have criminal records, gang members, drug dealers,” he told CBS News in November. “We’re getting them out of our country.”

But Mr. Trump’s advisers have said that to promptly reach his target number of deportations, the definition of who is a criminal would need to be broadened. In July 2015, the Migration Policy Institute, a bipartisan think tank, estimated that of the roughly 11 million immigrants living in the United States illegally, 820,000 had criminal records — a definition Mr. Obama mostly adhered to during his second term, evicting some 530,000 immigrants convicted of crimes since 2013.

Mr. Trump would need to expand the basket to include immigrants living in the United States illegally who have been charged but not convicted of crimes, those who have overstayed visas, those who have committed minor misdemeanors like traffic infractions, and those suspected of being gang members or drug dealers.

Targeting workers for immigration-related offenses, such as using a forged or stolen Social Security number or driver’s license, produced a significant uptick in deportations under Mr. Bush. But the practice was widely criticized for splitting up families, gutting businesses that relied on immigrant labor and taking aim at people who went to work every day, rather than dangerous criminals.”

****************************

There is no statutory or other widely accepted definition of a “criminal alien.”  As shown by this article in the NY Times, it could be narrow — covering only those who are actually removable from the United States by virtue of their crimes — or broad — covering anyone who has ever had contact with the criminal justice system and is potentially removable, regardless of whether there was a conviction or whether the crime itself is the ground for removal.  For example, “driving with an expired license” is not a ground for removal.  But, an undocumented individual arrested for “driving without a license” could be referred by the state or local authorities to the DHS to be placed in removal proceedings before a U.S. Immigration Judge.  If the Immigration Judge finds that such an individual has no legal status in the United States, and that individual cannot establish that she or he is entitled to some type of relief from removal, the Immigration Judge must enter an order of removal, regardless of the circumstances of the arrest or the overall equities of the case.

PWS

01/04/17

The Numbers Are In — DHS FY 2016 Enforcement Stats Confirm that Obama Administration is #1 In Removals!

http://immigrationimpact.com/2017/01/04/deportation-numbers-2016/

Joshua Breisblatt writes on Immigration Impact:

“Last week, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued its Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 immigration enforcement data which, coupled with the previous years’ totals under the Obama Administration, show that the total number of removals from FY 2009 to FY 2016 totaled more than 2.7 million. Simply stated, President Obama has deported more people than any other president in U.S. history.

However, underneath those numbers belie some important lessons about the changing dynamics of who is showing up at the U.S. border and how a November 2014 enforcement priorities memo shaped the number of people deported from the interior of the nation.

. . . .

This means, more would-be-asylees are arriving at the U.S. border, rather than economic migrants as in years’ past. Yet, many are being denied asylum or put through expedited deportation processes, both unworthy of the nation’s commitment to protect those in need.

Also of note, the number of individuals picked up and deported from the interior of the country is on the decline, likely due to the 2014 enforcement priorities memo that sought to avoid deporting individuals who posed no threat and have strong economic and community ties in the U.S.”

*******************************

How much enforcement is enough?  Never enough, according to some.  Others disagree and think we’re going way overboard.  As the Trump Administration is probably going to find out, “immigration enforcement” is more often than not a “can’t win” political proposition.

PWS

01/04/17

Former AG Eric Holder Finds A New Job — Defending Against Trump!

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/immigration/2017/01/california-legislature-enlists-former-us-atty-gen-eric-holder-to-defend-against-trump.html

Dean Kevin Johnson over at ImmigrationProf Blog reports that former AG Eric Holder has landed a “biggie” client, the State of California:

“As the Los Angeles Times reports, the California Legislature has tapped former U.S. Atty. Gen. Eric Holder Jr. to serve as outside counsel to guide the state’s legal strategy against Trump’s administration. “He will be our lead litigator, and he will have a legal team of expert lawyers on the issues of climate change, women and civil rights, the environment, immigration, voting rights — to name just a few,” Senate leader Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles) said. The leadership of the California Legislature has expressed opposition to President-elect Trump’s campaign positions on immigration.”

*******************************************

Ah, there is “life after the DOJ,” for all of us!

PWS

01/04/17

Is Trump’s Plan To Remove 3 Million “Criminal Aliens” Achievable?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-trumps-plan-to-deport-criminal-noncitizens-wont-work/2017/01/03/b68a3018-c627-11e6-85b5-76616a33048d_story.html?utm_term=.4810f9c58fbd

“No,” says Professor and Immigration Practitioner Kari Hong of Boston College Law School in this op-ed in the Washington Post:

“If Trump truly wants to focus on drug dealers, terrorists, murderers and rapists, he should call on Congress to restore immigration law’s focus on those whom prosecutors and criminal judges determined were dangerous in the first place — people who were sentenced to five years or more in prison. That’s what the law used to be, before it was changed in 1996 to cover many more crimes.

Instead of penalizing immigrants for minor crimes, immigration law needs to separate contributing immigrants from their non-contributing peers. Those who pay taxes, have children born in the United States, serve in the military, work in jobs American citizens will not take or help those around them need a path to legalization. Those who cause more harm than good should be deported. Restoring proportionality and common sense to immigration law would certainly help make America great again.”

**********************

Go over to ImmigrationProf Blog and the Washington Post at the above link and get the whole story.

PWS

01/04/17

 

Will Trump’s Populism Survive His Own Party’s Priorities? Only Time Will Tell

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/11/28/trumps-populism-is-about-to-be-tested/?tid=hybrid_experimentrandom_1_na&utm_term=.4a4152d9f78e

Matt O’Brien wites in Wonkblog:

“Trump might have to decide between giving up on his populism, and giving up on getting anything done. Whichever he chooses, though, there’s a good chance that wages will continue to go up and up as the labor market gets closer and closer to full employment. The irony is that they might not rise as much, at least not for the “forgotten men” and women who pushed Trump into the White House, as they otherwise would have.

The good news for Trump, though, is there are no counterfactuals in politics.”

PWS

01/04/17

Sessions No “Civil Rights Hero,” Say Former DOJ Cvil Rights Attorneys

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/jeff-sessions-says-he-handled-these-civil-rights-cases-he-barely-touched-them/2017/01/03/4ddfffa6-d0fa-11e6-a783-cd3fa950f2fd_story.html

“J. Gerald Hebert is director of the Voting Rights and Redistricting Program at the Campaign Legal Center. Joseph D. Rich is co-director of the Fair Housing and Community Development Project at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. William Yeomans is a fellow in law and government at American University’s Washington College of Law; on Election Day, he worked as a voter protection legal volunteer for the Democratic Party of Virginia.”

All three of the authors worked for the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice during Senator Session’s tenure as U.S. Attorney in Alabama.  Here’s part of what they have to say about the Senator’s claim to have supported important civil rights prosecutions:

“Sessions has not worked to protect civil rights. He worked against civil rights at every turn. Sessions knows that his real record on race and civil rights is harmful to his chances for confirmation. So he has made up a fake one. But many of us who were there — in Alabama in the 1980s, 1990s and beyond — are still around. We lived that story, too. And we are here to testify that Sessions has done many things throughout his 40-year career. Protecting civil rights has not been one of them.”

***********************

Read the full op-ed from the Washington Post at the link.

PWS

01/04/17

Law Professors & Civil Rights Activists Oppose Sessions Nomination For AG — Reports From The Washington Post & NY Times

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/more-than-1100-law-school-professors-nationwide-oppose-sessionss-nomination-as-attorney-general/2017/01/03/dbf55750-d1cc-11e6-a783-cd3fa950f2fd_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_sessions-330pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.183362aa3493

http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/03/us/naacp-occupy-jeff-sessions-office.html

I’m not aware that any Senator of either party has expressed an inclination to vote against Senator Sessions’s confirmation.

PWS

01/03/17

 

Will 2017 Bring Comprehensive Immigration Reform? — Rappaport Links

Immigrationcourtside.com and The Hill contributor Nolan Rappaport thinks immigration reform could happen under President Trump if conservatives abandon their “enforcement only approach,” liberals agree to a more robust enforcement at the border and the interior, and the two sides agree to “meet in the middle” for the common good.

Nolan writes:

“I am optimistic about comprehensive immigration reform this year. We have a president now who has experience making deals in the business world and I expect him to be more interested in getting an agreement than in advancing his party’s political objectives or in which side is right. That is one of the things I learned doing negotiations on the Hill. It never matters who is right. If you want a deal, you have to find out how to meet the political “needs” of both sides.

I am attaching a list of the articles I have published in case you want to post any more of them. Some of them might be useful for stimulating discussions. For the Hill articles, I think I am limited to posting titles and links.”

Here are the links to some of Nolan’s other articles in The Hill:

  1. Pre-Registration: A Proposal to Kick-Start Comprehensive Immigration Reform (Mar. 5, 2007), http://www.ilw.com/articles/2007,0314-rappaport.shtm
  2. Implementing Immigration Reform in the Age of Belt Tightening (Feb. 15, 2009); http://www.visalaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/newsletter.pdf at p. 23
  3. Catch 22 (July 12, 2010), http://www.ilw.com/articles/2010,0712-Rappaport.shtm
  4. More Ways to Move Forward on Immigration (Nov. 16, 2010),

    http://www.ilw.com/articles/2010,1116-rappaport.shtm

  5. Immigration Positions of President Barack Obama and the Republican Presidential Hopefuls (Dec. 5, 2011), http://www.ilw.com/articles/2011,1205-Rappaport.shtm
  6. Oversight Hearing on: “U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement: Priorities and the Rule of Law (Dec. 7, 2011), http://www.ilw.com/articles/2011,1207-Rappaport.shtm
  7. Analysis of Hearing Before the House Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement on, “Visa Waiver Program Oversight: Risks and Benefits of the Program (Dec. 20, 2011), http://www.ilw.com/articles/2011,1220-Rappaport.shtm
  8. Analysis of the Texas Border Coalition’s Report, Without Strategy: America’s Border Security Blunders Facilitate and Empower Mexico’s Drug Cartels (Jan. 26, 2012), http://www.ilw.com/articles/2012,0126-Rappaport.shtm
  9. Analysis of a Hearing Before the House Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement on, “Regional Perspectives on Agricultural Guest Worker Programs (Feb. 28, 2012), http://www.ilw.com/articles/2012,0228-rappaport.shtm
  10. Contentious Development of the Passenger Name Records Agreement Between the United States and The European Union (May 2, 2012), http://www.ilw.com/articles/2012,0502-rappaport.shtm
  11. Analysis Of A Hearing Before The Senate Subcommittee on Immigration, Refugees And Border Security On, “Examining the Constitutionality And Prudence Of State And Local Governments Enforcing Immigration Law” (May 17, 2012), http://www.ilw.com//articles/2012,0517-rappaport.shtm

12. Canada’s New Refugee System (July 27, 2012), http://www.ilw.com/articles/2012,0727- Rappaport.shtm

13. Threats to Our Nation’s Borders (Dec. 3, 2012), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?940- Article-Threats-to-Our-Nation-s-Borders-by-Nolan-Rappaport

14. Are Terrorists Exploiting Refugee Programs? (Dec. 11, 2012),

http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?987-Article-Are-Terrorists-Exploiting-Refugee- Programs-by-Nolan-Rappaport

  1. Canada’s Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program is encouraging Mexican farm workers to go to Canada instead of to the United States. (Jan. 16, 2013), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?1164-Article-Canada-s-Season-Agricultural-Worker- Program-Is-Encouraging-Mexican-Farm-Workers-To-Go-To-Canada-Instead-Of-To- The-United-States-by-Nolan-Rappaport
  2. What is IRCA, and What Does It Have To Do with Comprehensive Immigration Reform? (Feb. 8, 2013), https://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/immigration/b/immigration- law-blog/archive/2013/02/08/what-is-irca-and-what-does-it-have-to-do-with- comprehensive-immigration-reform.aspx?Redirected=true
  3. Will House Republicans Accept the Senate Proposal for Immigration Reform? (Feb. 25, 2013), http://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/immigration/b/immigration-law- blog/archive/2013/02/25/will-house-republicans-accept-the-senate-proposal-for- immigration-reform.aspx

18. Harvest of Shame Revisited (May 23, 2013),

http://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/immigration/b/outsidenews/archive/2013/05/2 3/nolan-rappaport-harvest-of-shame-revisited.aspx

  1. Is DHS Enforcing Our Immigration Laws? (June 17, 2013), http://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/immigration/b/outsidenews/archive/2013/06/1 7/nolan-rappaport-is-dhs-enforcing-our-immigration-laws.aspx
  2. What is SBInet? And what does it have to do with spending billions of dollars on border security? (July 25, 2013), http://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/immigration/b/outsidenews/archive/2013/07/2 5/what-is-sbinet-and-what-does-it-have-to-do-with-spending-billions-of-dollars-on- border-security.aspx
  3. DACA – Lessons Learned (March 26, 2014), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?2971- Article-DACA-%96-Lessons-Learned-By-Nolan-Rappaport
  4. What are other countries doing to secure their borders? (Apr. 10, 2014), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?3019-Article-What-are-other-countries-doing-to- secure-their-borders-By-Nolan-Rappaport
  5. In 2012, foreign workers in the United States sent remittances to their home countries totaling more than $123,273,000,000 (Apr. 22, 2014), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?3056-Article-In-2012-foreign-workers-in-the-United- States-sent-remittances-to-their-home-countries-totaling-more-than-123-273-000-000- By-Nolan-Rappaport%C2%A0

2

24. It is time to try a different approach to comprehensive immigration reform (May 2, 2014),

http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?3087-Article-It-is-time-to-try-a-different-approach-to- comprehensive-immigration-reform-By-Nolan-Rappaport

  1. Meet the Challenge of Unaccompanied Alien Children at the Southwest Border: Is there a better way? (July 10, 2014), http://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/immigration/b/insidenews/archive/2014/07/10 /nolan-rappaport-is-there-a-better-way.aspx
  2. Immigration activists are pressing President Obama to halt deportations for as many undocumented immigrants as possible. This is a “be-careful-what-you-wish-for” situation. (August 14, 2014), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?3423-Article- Immigration-activists-are-pressing-President-Obama-to-halt-deportations-for-as-many- undocumented-immigrants-as-possible-This-is-a-%93be-careful-what-you-wish-for%94- situation-By-Nolan-Rappaport

27. Is the Visa Waiver Program as secure as it is supposed to be? (Sep. 10, 2014),

http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?3494-Article-Is-the-Visa-Waiver-Program-as-secure- as-it-is-supposed-to-be-By-Nolan-Rappaport

  1. Why is Australia being criticized for the way it treats asylum seekers and unaccompanied alien children? (March 20, 2015), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?4182-Article-Why- is-Australia-being-criticized-for-the-way-it-treats-asylum-seekers-and-unaccompanied- alien-children-By-Nolan-Rappaport
  2. What happens to people who are forced to leave their homes to escape armed conflict or persecution and are not able to leave their countries to seek refuge? (May 6, 2015), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?4372-Article-What-happens-to-people-who-are- forced-to-leave-their-homes-to-escape-armed-conflict-or-persecution-and-are-not-able- to-leave-their-countries-to-seek-refuge-By-Nolan-Rappaport
  3. Analysis of a hearing before the House Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security on, “The Outer Ring of Border Security: DHS’s International Security Programs” (June 26, 2015), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?4611-Article-Analysis-of-a-hearing-before- the-House-Subcommittee-on-Border-and-Maritime-Security-on-The-Outer-Ring-of- Border-Security-DHSs-International-Security-Programs-By-Nolan-Rappaport

31. Analysis of Immigration Subcommittee’s Sanctuary Cities Hearing (July 28, 2015),

http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?4767-Article-Analysis-of-Immigration- Subcommittee%92s-Sanctuary-Cities-Hearing-By-Nolan-Rappaport

32. Immigration positions of Republican presidential hopefuls, with comments (August 13, 2015), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?4869-Article-Immigration-positions-of- Republican-presidential-hopefuls-with-comments-By-Nolan-Rappaport

3

  1. Will electing one of the democratic presidential hopefuls move us closer to the passage of a comprehensive immigration reform bill? (September 8, 2015), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?4995-Article-Will-electing-one-of-the-democratic- presidential-hopefuls-move-us-closer-to-the-passage-of-a-comprehensive-immigration- reform-bill-By-Nolan-Rappaport
  2. The SBInet project produced a virtual fence only 53 miles long at a cost to the American taxpayers of one billion dollars. What can we expect from the project that replaced it, the Arizona Border Surveillance Technology Plan? (September 21, 2015), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?5051-Article-The-SBInet-project-produced-a-virtual- fence-only-53-miles-long-at-a-cost-to-the-American-taxpayers-of-one-billion-dollars- What-can-we-expect-from-the-project-that-replaced-it-the-Arizona-Border-Surveillance- Technology-Plan-By-Nolan-Rappaport

35. What is the United States accomplishing with its refugee program? (October 5, 2015),

http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?5117-Article-What-is-the-United-States- accomplishing-with-its-refugee-program-By-Nolan-Rappaport

  1. Republicans raise legitimate concerns about Syrian refugees, but the bill they have passed to address those concerns would just impose additional layers of bureaucracy on the refugee background investigation process. (November 24, 2015), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?5422-Article-Republicans-raise-legitimate-concerns- about-Syrian-refugees-but-the-bill-they-have-passed-to-address-those-concerns-would- just-impose-additional-layers-of-bureaucracy-on-the-refugee-background-investigation- process-By-Nolan-Rappaport
  2. Analysis of the hearing before the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, “Why is the Biometric Exit Tracking System Still Not in Place?” (January 25, 2016), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?5777-Article-Analysis-of-the-hearing-before- the-Senate-Subcommittee-on-Immigration-and-the-National-Interest-%93Why-is-the- Biometric-Exit-Tracking-System-Still-Not-in-Place-%94-By-Nolan-Rappaport
  3. Analysis of hearing before the Houses Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security on, “Another surge of illegal immigrants along the Southwestern Border: Is this the Obama Administration’s new normal?” (February 12, 2016), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?5888-Article-Analysis-of-hearing-before-the-Houses- Subcommittee-on-Immigration-and-Border-Security-on-%93Another-surge-of-illegal- immigrants-along-the-Southwestern-Border-Is-this-the-Obama-Administration%92s- new-normal-%94-By-Nolan-Rappaport
  4. Has President Barack Obama sabotaged an attempt by Congress to keep terrorists from using the Visa Waiver Program to enter the United States? (February 29, 2016), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?5969-Article-Has-President-Barack-Obama- sabotaged-an-attempt-by-Congress-to-keep-terrorists-from-using-the-Visa-Waiver- Program-to-enter-the-United-States-By-Nolan-Rappaport

4

  1. President Obama’s use of executive discretion could have unintended consequences if Donald Trump becomes our next president, (March 7, 2016), http://www.ilw.com/articles/2016,0307-Rappaport.pdf
  2. Should deportations be restricted to deportable aliens who have criminal records? (March 17, 2016), http://www.ilw.com/articles/2016,0317-Rappaport.pdf
  3. The Political Correctness Movement has succeeded in imposing its will on the Library of Congress. (April 1, 2016), http://www.ilw.com/articles/2016,0401-Rappaport.pdf
  4. If he is elected to the presidency, Donald Trump will have statutory authority to suspend the entry of all Muslim aliens (April 20, 3016), http://www.ilw.com/articles/2016,0420- Rappaport.pdf
  5. Analysis of the April 28, 2016, hearing before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on, “Criminal Aliens Released by the Department of Homeland Security.” (May 20, 2016), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?6449-Article-Analysis-of- the-April-28-2016-hearing-before-the-House-Committee-on-Oversight-and-Government- Reform-on-%93Criminal-Aliens-Released-by-the-Department-of-Homeland-Security- By-Nolan-Rappaport
  6. Undocumented aliens who entered the United States before 1972, and have resided here continuously since then, may be eligible for lawful status under the little-known Registry legalization program (May 31, 2016), http://www.ilw.com/articles/2016-531- Rappaport.pdf

46. What is Donald Trump really saying about immigration reform? (June 15, 2016),

http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?6587-Article-What-is-Donald-Trump-really-saying- about-immigration-reform-By-Nolan-Rappaport

  1. Should people who want comprehensive immigration reform vote for Hillary? (July 11, 2016), http://www.ilw.com/articles/2016,0711-Rappaport%20.pdf
  2. Why did the United States put more than 70,000 Japanese American citizens into internment camps during World War II? (July 21, 2016), http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?6774-Article-Why-did-the-United-States-put-more- than-70-000-Japanese-American-citizens-into-internment-camps-during-W

49. The refugee crisis is being blamed for the terrorist attacks in Europe (August 2, 2016),

Click to access 2016,0802-Rappaport.pdf

50. Is Australia abusing child asylum seekers? (August 15, 2016),

http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?6907-Article-Is-Australia-abusing-child-asylum- seekers-By-Nolan-Rappaport

5

  1. Republicans will continue to reject comprehensive immigration reform bills until these problems are resolved (August 27, 2016), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/republicans-will-continue-to-reject-comprehensive- immigration_us_57c1f93ee4b0b01630df6454 and http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?7003&postid=326089#comments_326089
  2. Is Trump’s Ten-Point Immigration Plan a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing? (August 31, 2016), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/is-trumps- ten-point-immigration-plan-a-tale-told-by_us_57c5ba5fe4b004ff0420dcfc and http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?6999-Is-Trump-s-Ten-Point-Immigration-Plan-a-tale- told-by-an-idiot-full-of-sound-and-fury-signifying-nothing-By-Nolan-Rappaport
  3. Hillary’s immigration enforcement policies could have unintended consequences. (September 5, 2016), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillarys-immigration- enforcement-policies-could-have_us_57cc6a15e4b07addc4132fcc?mvr57k1sm2g2v5cdi and http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?9422-Hillary-s-immigration-enforcement-policies-could- have-unintended-consequences
  4. Hillary’s immigration policies will not lead to comprehensive immigration reform. (September 10, 2016), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/57d47fbae4b0273330ac42a5?timestamp=1473566 787180 and http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?9435-Hillary%92s-immigration-policies-will- not-lead-to-comprehensive-immigration-reform-By
  5. Asylum claims of unaccompanied alien children contribute to backlog crisis in our immigration courts. (September 16, 2016), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/57daaf27e4b0d5920b5b25f0?timestamp=14779558 39975

56. Deportation Without Due Process? (September 20, 2016),

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/deportation-without-due- process_us_57e01aebe4b053b1ccf2a109?timestamp=1474391017164 and http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?9452-Deportation-Without-Due-Process

57. Does anyone really know how many undocumented aliens there are? (Sep. 25, 2016),

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/57e41782e4b09f67131e3e7c?timestamp=1474689 173130 and
http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?9462-Does-anyone-really-know-how-many- undocumented-aliens-there-are

58. Will Muslim Americans be put in internment camps if more 9/11 attacks occur? (October 1, 2016),

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/57ec0d3be4b0972364deaa05?timestamp=1477955 720792

6

59. The door is wide open for terrorists to use the Visa Waiver Program to come to the U.S. (October 5, 2016), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/57f4275fe4b0ab1116a54b52?timestamp=14756431 12224 and http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?9483-The-door-is-wide-open-for-terrorists-to-use-the- Visa-Waiver-Program-to-come-to-the-U-S-by-Nolan-Rappaport&bt=47219

60. What do we know about Syrian refugees? (October 12, 2016),

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/57fbd438e4b0b665ad81873a?timestamp=1476313 713660 and http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?9493-What-do-we-know-about-Syrian-refugees-by- Nolan-Rappaport

  1. Schumer is wrong; if Hillary Clinton is elected, immigration reform will be impossible. (October 18, 2016), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/5806bc57e4b021af347763dc?timestamp=1476852 640318 and http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?9503-Shumer-is-wrong-if-Hillary-Clinton-is-elected- immigration-reform-will-be-impossible-by-Nolan-Rappaport
  2. We aren’t doing enough to help Syrian refugees, but how much more can we do? (October 24, 2016), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/580bf50ae4b0b1bd89fdb3c6?timestamp=14774237 45093 and http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?9509-We-aren%92t-doing-enough-to-help-Syrian- refugees-but-how-much-more-can-we-do-by-Nolan-Rappaport&bt=47494
  3. Aliens entering the US as visitors and never leaving has become more of a problem than illegal entries across the Mexican border. (October 31, 2016), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/5816286ae4b096e870696739?timestamp=1477954 741569 and http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?9523-Half-a-million-aliens-a-year-enter-as-visitors-and- never-leave-and-neither-candidate-has-a-solution-to-that-problem

64. President Elect Donald Trump will not be able to deport millions of people. (November 10, 2016),

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/5824c8c5e4b0bb5f0af37f01?timestamp=14789653 34261 and http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?9546-President-Elect-Donald-Trump-will-not-be-able-to- deport-millions-of-people-By-Nolan-Rappaport

65. Will the filibuster save the Democrats from an onslaught of Republican legislation? (November 15, 2016), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/5829f30de4b02b1f5257a6c3?timestamp=14792725 86100 and

7

http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?9554-Will-the-filibuster-save-the-Democrats-from-an- onslaught-of-Republican-legislation-By-Nolan-Rappaport

  1. Note to President Elect Trump, “Find out why the SBInet project failed before you build your wall.” (November 20, 2016), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/5831c0bae4b0d28e552150b0?timestamp=1479709 085554 and http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?9563-Note-to-President-Elect-Trump-%93Find-out-why- the-SBInet-project-failed-before-you-build-your-wall-%94
  2. The key to successful immigration enforcement may be to let the Labor Department handle it. (November 23, 2016), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/5835b67ce4b050dfe61878d7?timestamp=1479968 984594 and http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?9568-The-key-to-successful-immigration-enforcement- may-be-to-let-the-Labor-Department-handle-it
  3. Will Trump be able to use information from DACA applications in removal proceedings? (November 28, 2016), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/58390e6ee4b050dfe6187bec?timestamp=14801946 80041 and http://discuss.ilw.com/content.php?7407-Article-Will-Trump-Be-Able-To-Use- Information-From-DACA-Applications-In-Removal-Proceedings-By-Nolan-Rappaport
  4. What immigration enforcement measures is the Senate planning to legislate in 2017? (December 3, 2016), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/583e56bee4b08347769c0540?timestamp=1480997 855952 and

    http://blogs.ilw.com/entry.php?9582- What%20immigration%20enforcement%20measures%20is%20the%20Senate%20planni ng%20to%20legislate%20in%202017?%20By%20Nolan%20Rappaport

70. To control immigration, Trump needs to think outside the wall (December 12, 2016),

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/immigration/310078-to-control-immigration- trump-needs-to-think-outside-the-wall

  1. Give DREAMers a break, hardliners a bone with GOP immigration bill (December 20, 2016), http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/immigration/311243-gop-immigration-bill- gives-dreamers-a-break-hardliners-a-bone
  2. With Obama’s immigration legacy, Trump inherits ‘home free magnet’ (December 28, 2016), http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/immigration/311994-thanks-to-obamas- immigration-legacy-trump-inherits-our-home#bottom-story-socials

PWS

01/02/17

As Federal Hiring Freeze Looms, The Chickens Might Be Coming Home To Roost At The Beleaguered U.S. Immigration Court System — More than 20% Of Judicial Vacancies Unfilled!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/federal-agencies-rush-to-fill-job-openings-before-trump-takes-office-jan-20/2016/12/30/de0c1030-cdd8-11e6-a747-d03044780a02_story.html?hpid=hp_local-news_trumphiring-940pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.81ad4681c3c9

“Leaders at these agencies are filling open positions with transfers and outside hires and are making internal promotions before Trump takes office Jan. 20, according to internal documents and interviews.

The hiring could increase tensions between the Trump transition team and the Obama administration — a relationship that has grown worse in recent days due to disagreements over how the United States should handle its relationship with Israel and the issuance of new sanctions against Russia over its role in hacking incidents tied to the election.

Sean Spicer, the incoming White House press secretary, said in an interview late Friday that an agreement was struck in November that no new hires would be made after Dec. 1.

“After the election, the current administration notified us there would be a hiring freeze as of Dec. 1,” he said. “The understanding was that there would be a full accounting of anyone put on the payroll after then.”

White House Office of Management and Budget spokeswoman Shannon Buckingham said in an email early Saturday, “On Dec. 7, the administration imposed a moratorium on the hiring of senior executives within the civil service, known as the Senior Executive Service or SES.”

“This policy is consistent with previous transitions and is intended to ensure that incoming agency heads have the opportunity to make or approve executive hiring decisions that will impact the agency’s performance in the next administration,” she added.”

**********************************

As I have mentioned before, the U.S. Department of Justice’s (“DOJ’s”) Executive Office for Immigration Review (“EOIR”), which administers the U.S. Immigration Court System, is on the verge of leaving at least 78 U.S. Immigration Judge positions unfilled at the end of the Obama Administration.  As of November 8, 2016, EOIR had filled just 296 of its authorized and funded 374 Immigration Judge vacancies. However, with a number of year-end retirements among the Immigration Judge Corps, the actual number of vacancies is almost certainly exceeds that previously announced.

Given that the U.S. Immigration Courts are struggling with a backlog of well over 500,000 cases — more than two years of work for 296 Immigration Judges, even assuming that they were all trained and fully productive, and that no new cases were filed — the lack of urgency in filling these judicial positions seems unusual, to say the least.

Over the past two Administrations, the DOJ has turned a Civil Service hiring system into a multi-tiered bureaucratic quagmire resulting in a hiring cycle that in too many cases substantially exceeds the much-criticized Senate confirmation process for Article III Federal Judges. But, the multiple layers of bureaucracy haven’t actually improved hiring quality.

Conspicuously absent from the process is meaningful input from anyone who actually practices in, appears before, sits on, or “consumes” the “judicial product” of the Immigration Courts (like judges of the U.S. Courts of Appeals who review final decisions from the Immigration Courts).   Not surprisingly, the results of this opaque bureaucratic exercise have been heavily weighted toward new Immigration Judges from government backgrounds, to the disadvantage of those with private practice, academic, or non-governmental organization experience.

While the claimed “complexity” of Federal background checks and security clearances sometimes is blamed for the delays, that is, in plain terms, “poppycock.” The clearance process goes exactly as fast as the Attorney General tells it to go. Those of us who are familiar with the process, and have actually participated in it, know that it is a series of largely ministerial tasks, which with proper “motivation” can be accomplished in a matter of days, rather than months. The idea that any cabinet officer normally would wait a year or more to bring on needed talent from the private sector to fill a critical senior position is simply preposterous. In the past, senior level positions at EOIR and the DOJ, including Immigration Judges and Appellate Immigration Judges who serve on the Board of Immigration Appeals, were filled with candidates from outside the government in a fraction of the time IJ hiring currently takes.

As noted in the Washington Post article, the Trump Administration has announced an intention to impose an immediate hiring freeze. Immigration Judge vacancies might, or might not, be exempted as “public safety positions.” Nobody knows for sure.

U.S. Immigration Judges are senior Civil Service officials, with their own senior pay scale established by Congress. Immigration Judges certainly are equivalent to the Senior Executive Service positions that the Obama Administration appears to have agreed to informally freeze as of December 1, 2016, according to the article. Even if DOJ belatedly tries to rush new appointments through prior to January 20, it is far from clear that the incoming Administration would be legally bound to honor such last minute appointments, let alone outstanding offers.

The chickens might be coming home to roost for the DOJ’s and EOIR’s lackadaisical administration of the U.S. Immigration Courts. And, at this point, it could be too late to solve this self-created disaster. If so, in addition to those who might reasonably have expected to receive Immigration Judge appointments, the real losers will be due process and the American people.

PWS

12/31/16

 

 

 

Is American Democracy Becoming “Illiberal?”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/america-is-becoming-a-land-of-less-liberty/2016/12/29/2a91744c-ce09-11e6-a747-d03044780a02_story.html?utm_term=.93e4df17ef17

Writing an op-ed in the Washington Post, Fareed Zakaria worries about the trend:

“Two decades ago, I wrote an essay in Foreign Affairs that described an unusual and worrying trend: the rise of illiberal democracy. Around the world, dictators were being deposed and elections were proliferating. But in many of the places where ballots were being counted, the rule of law, respect for minorities, freedom of the press and other such traditions were being ignored or abused. Today, I worry that we might be watching the rise of illiberal democracy in the United States — something that should concern anyone, Republican or Democrat, Donald Trump supporter or critic.

What we think of as democracy in the modern world is really the fusing of two different traditions. One is, of course, public participation in selecting leaders. But there is a much older tradition in Western politics that, since the Magna Carta in 1215, has centered on the rights of individuals — against arbitrary arrest, religious conversion, censorship of thought. These individual freedoms (of speech, belief, property ownership and dissent) were eventually protected, not just from the abuse of a tyrant but also from democratic majorities. The Bill of Rights, after all, is a list of things that majorities cannot do.”

PWS

12/31/16

Deportations Down in 2016 — Focus on Criminals in the Interior is Key — But, Some Question Gov’s Broad Concept of “Criminal”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/barack-obama-deportations-2016_us_58668157e4b0eb5864890a03?section=us_politics

“DHS officials themselves say the falling interior deportation numbers reflect the Obama administration’s policy of focusing their efforts on removing people with criminal histories.

Virtually all of the people deported from within the interior of the United States ― 92 percent ― had been convicted of a crime that put them within one of ICE’s top three priorities for removal.

But ICE’s top priority removal category includes people convicted of the offenses of illegal entry and reentry ― non-violent crimes that don’t distinguish them much from other undocumented immigrants. DHS officials did not immediately provide a breakdown of the criminal offenses deportees had been convicted of.

The number of deportations has also dropped in recent years partly because the number of people trying to enter the country has plummeted. Border Patrol apprehended about 408,900 people in the 2016 fiscal year, which is generally considered an indicator of how many people attempted to enter without authorization. In 2000, agents picked up nearly 1.7 million people trying to cross the border illegally.

A growing share of those who do cross illegally into the United States are Central Americans, who often seek asylum or other humanitarian relief. Their cases can take years to wind their way through backlogged immigration courts and do not result in swift deportations. In 2016, border agents apprehended more Central Americans than they did Mexicans, a switch that happened for the first time in 2014.”

PWS

12/30/16

Wow! Senator Tom Cotton (R-ARK) Wants to Jack Up Wages And Benefits For Lower Level US Workers And Make the “Fat Cats” Pay Their Share — How? — By Cutting Immigration, Naturally

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/immigration/2016/12/seantor-tom-cotton-r-arkansas-fix-immigration-its-what-voters-want.html

Over on ImmigrationProf Blog and the NYT, Sen. Cotton says that cutting immigration, both legal and illegal, will solve all the problems of working class Americans.  Yet, I’m skeptical that the Senator’s Republican businessmen buddies will be paying  $25+/hr. plus full bennies for folks to pick veggies, clean buildings, be nannies for their kids, mow lawns, pour concrete, wash dishes, wait tables, clean tables, empty bedpans, make beds, work grocery checkout lines, pick up garbage, cook short orders, cut brush, dig trenches, trim  trees, prune shrubs, provide daycare for their elderly parents, etc.  But, I’m even more skeptical that out of work coal miners, factory workers, administrative assistants, air conditioning fabricators, secretaries, etc. will be lining up to to relocate at their own expense to take these jobs, even at higher wages.   And, even if they did, things like harvesting, pruning, caring for others, and cooking actually take skills that many out of work Americans don’t possess or don’t care to learn, no matter how dire their personal circumstances. If Sen. Cotton thinks that’s what Americans really voted for, perhaps he’s spent too much time inside the Beltway.

PWS

12/26/16

 

 

 

More From Nolan Rappaport in “The Hill” on How the Trump Administration and Congress Could Agree on Immigration Reform

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/immigration/310078-to-control-immigration-trump-needs-to-think-outside-the-wall

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/immigration/311243-gop-immigration-bill-gives-dreamers-a-break-hardliners-a-bone

I found some common themes:

  1.  The Trump Administration needs to “Think Outside the Wall.”  Without some fundamental changes from Obama Administration policies and Trump rhetoric, nothing is going to change.
  2. There must be some type of legalization for “Dreamers” and others to get Immigration Court dockets back under control.
  3. Interior enforcement must be reinstated and employer sanctions enforced to cut off the “magnet” for undocumented immigration.
  4. Everyone involved must work together and compromise for our immigration system to be credible.

PWS

12/29/16