Stephanie Carnes writes in HuffPost:
UPDATE: On Friday, President Trump signed a presidential proclamation denying asylum for immigrants who request it after crossing the border illegally rather than at a port of entry.
In a pre-midterms television ad deemed too racist for CNN, NBC and even Fox News, the White House described members of the large group of Central American migrants making their way through Mexico as “dangerous illegal criminals.” Ominous music played in the background of the ad as images of a convicted Mexican criminal were spliced with footage of the caravan.
This description was inaccurate, not to mention illogical ― aren’t hardened criminals and narco-traffickers wily enough to avoid such an arduous and physically taxing journey, and one that has captured such public attention and scrutiny?
The truth about these migrants comes down to the most basic of human needs: survival. Those who have joined the caravan have done so because their reality is simple. In the Northern Triangle countries of El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, where violence is endemic and justice is illusory, it’s a question of life or death.
The truth about these migrants comes down to the most basic of human needs: survival. Those who have joined the caravan have done so because their reality is simple. In the Northern Triangle countries of El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, where violence is endemic and justice is illusory, it’s a question of life or death.
Trump, in his roiling pre-midterm elections hate-speech tour, painted the caravan as an “invasion,” even though it’s a common occurrence that hasn’t disrupted the peace before. Traveling in a large group is far safer than traveling alone, with a human smuggler or in a small group, and migrant advocacy groups have organized large caravans for at least a decade. But beyond the president and his party’s racist rhetoric, there’s a broad assumption that such an influx of immigrants will both threaten American values and weigh heavily on the American taxpayer.
Like previous waves of immigrants, this group of new arrivals may need help to acclimate to this complex country of ours. Some will need medical care, thanks to years of living in countries with limited medical infrastructure. Others will need counseling to heal from layers of traumatic experiences against the backdrop of horrible violence ― which, lest we forget, the United States played a significant role in creating.
But they won’t need much. If I’ve learned one thing during my tenure as a trauma-focused clinician, it is this: Central American immigrants are resilient. They are driven and strong. They persevere. Despite the staggering hardships and suffering they have endured, they are defined by their ability to “seguir adelante” ― to move forward.
It’s a phrase that I’ve heard hundreds of times ― perhaps thousands ― in my therapy office. Nearly all my young clients have voiced their desire to “seguir adelante.” The 17-year-old boy who witnessed his father’s murder, finding himself alone and in grave danger; the 15-year-old girl who was kidnapped by the Zetas cartel in Mexico and held for ransom for weeks; the 18-year-old boy who served as a lookout for the MS-13 gang in exchange for his sister’s life before fleeing his country.
“Tengo que seguir adelante,” they tell me. I must continue moving forward.
The 13-year-old indigenous child who recounted months of eating “grass soup” when tortillas became too expensive. The 16-year-old who mourns the loss of her brothers ― all three of them, murdered while crossing gang-controlled territory. The 20-year-old working through the night at a bakery, then coming to school filled with energy and endless questions about the workings of American bicameral government.
Tengo que seguir adelante.
While their experiences are varied and diverse, my clients have two things in common. They have been exposed to multiple horrifying traumatic events, and they have an indefatigable desire to heal, grow stronger and move forward.
This phenomenon is illustrative of the positive psychology concept of post-traumatic growth, which posits that those who are exposed to trauma discover or develop new capabilities: closer social and familial bonds, increased resilience, stronger motivation and deepened spirituality.
So if the resilience of the “adelante” mentality drives these immigrants forward in spirit, what compels them to move forward physically? Perhaps they were unable to pay last month’s “impuestos de guerra,” or war taxes, to the local gang as rent for their space in the market. Maybe they refused to join the controlling gang in their neighborhood, despite the near-certainty of death if they stayed. Instead of remaining in Guatemala City, or Santa Tecla, or Tegucigalpa, they wagered it all, picked up and left.
They leave behind their families, their friends, their rich cultures, their language, their homeland. They understand the risks of the journey. They have heard the horror stories of kidnapping, rape, extortion and abandonment in the desert. Despite all this, they have decided to “seguir adelante,” fueled by hope for a brighter, safer future, to be achieved through hard work, determination and unwavering courage. Don’t those values sound reminiscent of those upon which our patchwork nation was founded?
In the end, all the migrant caravan really wants is to move forward. And as a democratic country founded on ideals of egalitarianism, isn’t it time for us to move forward, too?
Stephanie L. Carnes is a bilingual licensed clinical social worker at a large public high school in New York’s Hudson Valley. She was previously a clinician in a federally funded shelter program. She specializes in trauma treatment with Central American immigrant students and culturally competent mental health care.
Paul, Stephanie Carnes and you are absolutely correct that the government is knowingly putting forth a false narrative. When I was EOIR’s country conditions person a few years ago, I was invited by USCIS to a training at its HQ for asylum officers in which invited country experts painted a very grave and sympathetic picture of the shocking danger refugees from the Northern Triangle are fleeing. I brought one of those experts to repeat his presentation at the 2015 Immigration Judge training conference.
There is a well-known quote from a former Deputy UN High Commissioner for Refugees: “The public will not allow governments to be generous if it believes they have lost control.” Fear is a powerful emotion, and Trump and his real-life Voldemort advisor, Stephen Miller, know that if they can successfully sell this lie of a criminal invasion to the American public, they will shut down any reasonable discussion to provide refugee protection.
There are so many officials to be angry at, but as a former EOIR employee, I plan on focusing on that agency’s leadership. You correctly point out the need for asylum seekers to have lawyers, and yet EOIR has for years (even under the Obama Administration!) opposed appointed counsel for children, going as far as having one of its Assistant Chief Judges testify that 3 and 4 year olds can represent themselves just fine. We have cases being removed from judges who attempt to be fair, and Assistant Chief Justices who will gladly travel to a city to unfairly issue an improper removal order without considering the legal arguments in an attempt to appease the AG. We have previously intelligent BIA members who suddenly forget the law and become rubber stamps out of fear of the same AG.
As their entire motive seems to be self-preservation, we have a duty to call them out by name. There will one day be a change in administration, and all of us need to start now arguing that anyone who is now abandoning their oath and denying justice to refugees to insure their own job stability has no place in the next administration.
Well said, Jeffrey! Human lives as well as the integrity of our nation are at stake. With more refugees than ever and conditions remaining horrible in the Northern Triangle, there is no rational explanation for why EOIR asylum approval rates are cratering. They should be skyrocketing. Just on the basis of country conditions read in an honest manner (unlike Session’s intentional distortion in AB) huge numbers should be getting CAT at a minimum. The system is taking a dive. Going along to get along with a group of evil individuals who are intentionally perverting the law and creating false fact scenarios (as Sessions did in AB) is not acceptable. AB was so poorly written and reasoned that there actually isn’t any reason why well-presented domestic violence cases shouldn’t still be granted. And, as we know the whole “notice of hearing” system is broken and has been intentionally used by DHS and EOIR to distort the number of no-shows. There are all sorts of ways that the current system could be used to deal with this humanitarian situation in a humane and legal manner. That the Administration is choosing to set up a bogus “emergency” with the assistance of EOIR is unconscionable. For two years there has been no ethical accountability in Government, particularly in immigration. Time for that to end!
PWS
11-10-18