Hon. “Sir Jeffrey” Chase reports:
The attached is the final “as filed” version of our latest brief in Chavez-Chilel v. Garland, in support of the motion for rehearing/rehearing en banc. This one is very “all in the family,” as Sue Roy is our counsel, Sue and I drafted the brief, and decisions from Miriam Hayward and Charles Honeyman are attached as exhibits.
There is also an amicus brief by law school professors, and joining NJ attorney Ted Murphy as petitioner’s counsel is Paul Hughes, who argued Kisor v. Willkie before the Supreme Court (as well a Nasrallah v. Barr, a Supreme Court victory in which we were amici).
Best, Jeff
*******************
Thanks to our wonderful colleague Judge Sue Roy for taking the lead on this!
🇺🇸Due Process Forever!
PWS
03-31-22
Thanks Paul! Usually the Third Circuit gets it right. And, just to demonstrate how wrong this decision is, OIL joined the motion to remand precisely because OIL attorneys agreed that the Third psg analysis is flawed.
Thanks for this 3 excellent brief, Sue, and for your leadership in fighting for due process!
DPF!
🗽😎👍🏼⚖️