![Judge Lawrence O. Burman](https://i0.wp.com/immigrationcourtside.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/maxresdefault.jpg?resize=660%2C371&ssl=1)
U.S. Immigration Judge
Arlington, VA
Pictured addressing conference at CIS
PHOTO: YouTube
By Paul Wickham Schmidt
Courtside Exclusive
July 30, 2022
Reliable sources tell Courtside that highly-respected U.S. Immigration Judge Lawrence O. “Larry” Burman has been suspended with pay from hearing cases at the Arlington Immigration Court. Reportedly, for the past three months, the distinguished veteran jurist has been “banned” from chambers and relegated to deciding motions from home electronically.
The genesis of the suspension allegedly is a complaint of sexual harassment in court filed by the ICE Office of Chief Counsel in Arlington. A source close to Burman says that he told them he has not received any detailed notice of exactly what he has been accused of, nor has he been given any timeline or details about the alleged investigation.
EOIR is notorious for placing judges and others accused of wrongdoing on “administrative leave with full pay” — sometimes for years spanning several Administrations. Meanwhile, they conduct glacially slow “investigations” and dither over what, if any, formal discipline to impose.
Within the bureaucracy, “never-ending investigations” are sometimes used as a device to “persuade” employees out of favor with “management” to retire or resign. In reality, Courtside is unaware of any full-time trained investigative staff assigned to EOIR.
Significantly, DOJ policies do not appear to require suspension of the employee from public duties in a case such as this. “Danger to the personnel” or “disruptive presence” are the primary considerations. See HR ORDER DOJ1200.
Those who know and have worked with Judge Burman would find it absurd to believe that either of these situations apply to him. Indeed, one source interviewed for this article suggested, perhaps tongue in cheek, that “a propensity toward giving respondents a fair hearing” might help explain ICE’s and EOIR’s enthusiasm for having Judge Burman “off the bench.”
Recently, Courtside described Judge Burman and one of his Arlington colleagues as the “gold standard” for fair, expert Immigration Judges. See https://wp.me/p8eeJm-7Ko. From that standpoint, the sudden suspension appears particularly unusual.
The action caught members of the private immigration bar in the DMV area by surprise. One attorney confirmed having merits cases recently scheduled before Judge Burman “orbited” several years out on the docket for no given reason except that Judge Burman was “out” and therefore unable to hear the cases. “Aimless Docket Reshuffling” and “churning” of cases is an endemic problem at EOIR, which is running an astounding, yet rapidly increasing, backlog of 1.8 million cases.
Other attorneys contacted by Courtside reacted with shock, sadness, and concern for Judge Burman’s well being. “I feel so bad to hear that. He is such a nice man and a good judge,” said one local practitioner.
Judge Burman has been an Immigration Judge for nearly a quarter-century, serving at the Los Angeles and Memphis Immigration Courts before arriving in Arlington. He has been a leader in court-related CLE, serving as a past chair of the FBA’s Immigration Section and the creator and editor emeritus of The Green Card, that section’s educational newsletter. He also has been an officer of the National Association of Immigration Judges (“NAIJ”), where (perhaps ironically) he successfully represented a number of colleagues charged with disciplinary infractions or wrongfully denied benefits.
Until “grounded” by the Trump DOJ, Judge Burman was one of a limited number of local judges eager and willing to participate in educational events sponsored by bar associations and other groups. A graduate of UVA and Maryland Law, and a U.S. Army veteran, Judge Burman had careers in the “Legacy INS” and private practice before being appointed to the bench by then Attorney General Janet Reno in 1998.
This is so sad to read. Judge Burman is indeed the gold standard for fair, expert immigration judges. His absence from Arlington is especially sad in light of the flood of recent hires who could benefit greatly from his experience. I don’t know what he is accused of doing (I guess he doesn’t either), but I hope this gets resolved soon.
It is especially disheartening to learn of the dastardly treatment of this distinguished jurist. He is a pleasure to appear before. He knows the law thoroughly and uniformly treats both attorneys and respondents fairly and with respect. I agree that it is unthinkable that any alleged behavior on his part could possibly be accurate and his untimely and disrespectful departure casts an appalling shadow over our court and the system as a whole.
I have known Judge Burman professionally from when he was one of the INS attorneys in Baltimore. A better, and more fair man both as opposing counsel, and a judge, I cannot ask for. Not only is he an exceptional lawyer/judge, but he is also an exceptional human being. I am extremely disappointed in the way he is being treated. There is no doubt that allegations of sexual harassment are serious allegations. However a speedy investigation and resolution is just as important.
My reliable sources tell me it was more than one complaint.