![Alicia A. Caldwell](https://i0.wp.com/immigrationcourtside.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/IMG_0384.jpg?resize=300%2C300&ssl=1)
Immigration Reporter
Wall Street Journal
![Brent Kendall](https://i0.wp.com/immigrationcourtside.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/D794BE68-994F-4BF3-A8CA-07139978E5F9.jpeg?resize=225%2C300&ssl=1)
Legal Reporter
Wall Street Journal
Brent Kendall and Alicia Caldwell report for the WSJ:
A federal appeals court for now agreed to narrow the effect of its recent ruling that blocked a Trump administration policy of returning immigrants at the southern U.S. border to Mexico while their requests for asylum are considered.
The San Francisco-based Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in an order issued Wednesday, said it ruled correctly last week that the administration’s “Remain in Mexico” policy is unlawful. But the court acknowledged the “intense and active controversy” over nationwide injunctions against administration policies and said it would limit its ruling for now to the two border states within its jurisdiction: Arizona and California.
. . .
The Ninth Circuit also said none of its ruling would go into effect until March 12, to give the Trump administration a week to ask the Supreme Court for an emergency stay to keep the policy in place every-where for the time being.
*******************
The plaintiffs have already “won” this case about the regime’s unlawful actions twice. But, they are yet to get any meaningful relief. Instead, folks continue to suffer and be irreparably harmed while the wheels of justice slowly grind.
PWS
03-06-20